¥80,000 and ¥728,000 can both be correct

doda’s FY2026 Q1 report says the average salary change across successful job changers using its agent service was +¥80,000.

Among only those whose salary increased after moving, the average increase was +¥728,000, the highest since FY2023 Q1.

The figures describe different populations. One is the overall average; the other is a conditional average for the salary-increase group.

One average can erase the shape of individual outcomes

Looking only at +¥80,000 can make job changing appear to have little salary impact. Looking only at +¥728,000 can create the opposite impression.

The report says 59.2% of successful movers saw a salary increase.

A single average therefore compresses a distribution in which some people gain, some stay flat and some lose.

Average Salary Change ≠ Individual Outcome

Banseog describes the signal as Average Salary Change ≠ Individual Outcome.

Market averages are useful for describing direction, but they do not directly predict an individual’s result.

Career decisions become more practical when people ask not only what the market average is, but which role, industry and experience combination makes their own outcome more likely.

Industry and occupation also change the distribution

The share of movers with a salary increase was 64.8% in IT and telecom, the highest among industries in the report.

By occupation, creator and creative roles reached 68.8%, while SE, infrastructure and web engineering reached 65.4%.

The same act of changing jobs can therefore produce different outcome distributions depending on where the candidate moves.

Do not treat 59.2% as your personal probability

This is not a probability sample of all workers in Japan. It covers people who used doda Agent Service and successfully changed jobs.

doda also states that it changed the definition used to calculate its job-changer count from April 2026.

The 59.2% figure should not be generalized as a universal probability that any worker in Japan will receive a raise by changing jobs.

The useful question is why you would land in the higher-outcome group

For an individual, the most useful question is not simply whether the average gain is ¥80,000.

It is whether another industry values the candidate’s skills more highly, whether their achievements travel across employers, and whether their capability is currently scarce.

The same experience can produce different salary outcomes in different markets.

BANSEOG VIEW | Career data is more useful as a distribution than as one average

In doda’s FY2026 Q1 data, the overall average salary change was +¥80,000, while the salary-increase group averaged +¥728,000.

The question is not which figure is the real one. They describe different populations.

An average summarizes a market. An individual career decision requires an additional question: which part of the outcome distribution are you most likely to enter?

When reading career statistics, what an average hides can matter as much as the average itself.

Banseog View — Average Salary Change ≠ Individual Outcome

doda FY2026 Q1 shows +¥80,000 average salary change overall, but +¥728,000 among those whose salary increased.

59.2% of successful movers saw an increase, with meaningful industry and occupation differences.

Market averages summarize direction; they do not directly describe an individual outcome.

Primary sources and references

The dataset covers people who used doda Agent Service and successfully changed jobs; it is not a probability sample of all workers in Japan. 'Decided salary' means the annual pay offered by the hiring company at the hiring decision. doda says its definition for job-changer counts changed from April 2026. Average Salary Change ≠ Individual Outcome is Banseog analysis.